Thursday, January 30, 2014

Freight Cars: Modeler’s resources for Reading Cars




Why does a Santa Fe Modeler care about a Reading car?  Where can he find info on one that he does find interesting?  Stuff comes from other places, shippers load that stuff in box cars, those box cars are what’s available where the stuff is being shipped.  In my case, WWII is using everything that can turn a wheel and then some.  Lots of foreign cars will be in the area you model.  Sometimes you find a picture that shows one of these foreign cars.  I just recently found some photos of Valley Division subjects for sale on eBay.  One of the photos showed a portion of a Reading box car with the dimensional data clearly visible. 



Those Data are:
Height
12 – 2
Width
 9 – 10
Inside Length
36 – 2
Inside Width
 8 - 7
Inside Height
 8 – 1
Cubic Feet
2515
Repack Date
7-26-41

I looked in the 1953 ORER and discovered two series of box cars that match this data, 4000-4999 and 10500-11549.  From the photo, these are class XMr.
  
An inquiry to the STMFC yahoo group led to a couple of references to a website devoted to the Reading with lots of information.  http://www.readingmodeler.com

When you open up the modeling references and drill down to the box car page you click on the XMr class and are rewarded with a highly detailed PDF at http://www.readingmodeler.com/images/rollingstock/boxcar/XMr.pdf

Compiled by John W. Hall, this document gives you the number of cars in service each year, details of what kind of roof, ends, doors and trucks were used.  And if you keep scrolling (the document is 87 pages) you come to a section that lists the build and retired dates by car number.  So, from this source, I see that I have a choice of nearly all car numbers in both series that were operating in my modeling era.  From John’s freight car data, our car had ARCH BAR trucks, was 85,000# 2515 Cu.Ft. capacity, had a Double Sheathed Wood Body, Steel Underframe, Murphy Steel Ends and a 6' wide door.  Built with Wood Roof and Wood Doors, many replaced in late 20's and early 30's with Steel Roof and Steel Doors.  It was 37'11" over end sills.  So far, I have not found a kit of the XMr, but according to a STMFC post, Funaro & Camerlengo may produce one if they can get 100 pre-orders.  Failing that, one could fudge the similar XMp kit that they produce that is the same inside length but 4 inches longer over the end sills.  



You would have to be careful to choose a car modified with the steel roof and Ajax brake wheel, but you could have a credible model.  And all this from a set of dimensional data in a picture of a Santa Fe Consolidation in Richmond.

John Barry
Cameron Park, CA

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

Industries at Pittsburg

This city will be one of the LDEs on the North Bay Lines.  Thanks to the San Jose Public Library, I was able to obtain a PDF set of the Sanborn Maps for Pittsburg and the other cities on the Valley Division.

The following is a list of industries taken from the Sanborn index map with the sheet number where they are found.  Not included in this list is Camp Stoneman, the Army's personnel depot for the Pacific Theater in WWII.  All Army troops bound for the Pacific got their final outprocessing there before they boarded ships in San Francisco or Oakland to make the long journey overseas.  More on Camp Stoneman in future posts.

Map     Pittsburg Industries      
           
2          Pioneer Dairy Company           
NRS
             
2          Standard Fisheries       
NRS

3          San Francisco International Fish Company       
NRS

4          F. E. Booth Company, Cannery           
235 East 1st Street
NRS waterfront
             
4          Johns-Mannville, Inc. Warehouse         
NRS

4          A. Paladini Fish Company        
397 East First Street
            NRS waterfront
           
4          San Joaquin Fish Company      
           
4          Western California Fish Company        
            299 East 1st Street
            NRS waterfront

6          Coast Counties Gas & Electric Company         
             
6          Pittsburg Soda Works 

8          Texaco Oil Company, Bulk oil station  
             
8          California Bean Growers Ware House Corporation,     
             
8          California Scrap Iron Corporation        

8          Johns-Mannville, Inc.
           
11        Coca Cola Supply Depot         
           
12        Pacific Public Service, office & shop    
             
12        River Lines, freight depot         
              
12        Seger Trucking Company        

15        Gladding McBean & Company, Fire brick Factory
            Stockton Fire Brick Company, Plant No. 3                              
            On SP
             
15        Union Ice Company     
            Pittsburg Ice & Fuel Company
            1081-1095 Railroad Ave.
             
16        C. A. Hooper & Company, Ware house          

16        Standard Oil Company of California Pipe Line Dept.    
           
19        Diamond Building Materials     
             
19        Redwood Manufacturing Company Inc.           
             
20        Columbia Steel Corporation     
             
20        National Chemical Company of California
                         
20        H. F. Lauritzen, ship repair yard & machine works       
             
20        Coast Counties Gas Company 

20        Union Oil Company of California         
                         



21        Pioneer Rubber Mills of California Inc. 
             

22        Great Western Electro Chemical Company (Dow)  


Other sources of industry information include city directories, the OPSIG shipper data base, and Santa Fe CLICK books and track charts.  More from those sources in future posts as well.

John Barry
Cameron Park, CA

      

Monday, January 27, 2014

Interline Codes

Interline Codes


What are they, and where can you find them?

Here’s an example page of the 1950 AAR Interline Accounting Codes from a document Tony Thompson has posted via his Blog, http://modelingthesp.blogspot.com/2012/08/railway-accounting-code-numbers.html





I refer you to his most excellent post on what they are, how they came about, and what the modeler can use them for.

What I offer in today’s post is an excel spreadsheet that makes them easy to find.  Tony was gracious to send me the complete 1950 list and I found a copy of the 1920 version in Google Docs.  That was great, but I model 1944, and there were some big differences between the two, with many roads added and others deleted.  A few even changed code numbers.  And there were also a couple of duplicate numbers.  All that is in the notes in my spread sheet.  It has a combined listing with the 1920 and 1950 numbers in columns on the left and other work sheets that show the 1920, 1950, and 1944 lists.  Whoa, 1944, how’d he get that you ask?  Well given that it doesn’t exist, but I needed it, I interpolated and combined the lists that do exist to come up with a reasonable list as it probably existed during the war.

Those roads and codes that appeared in both AAR lists were easy, they are in my 44 list.  But what about those that appear in one but not the other?    I used my 1943 and 1945 copies of the Official Railway Equipment Register.  If a new road was in the 50 list, I checked 43 to see if it existed in 1944.  In the 43 ORER and on the 50 list, it got included in my 44 list.  Then I looked at the ones that didn’t make it to 1950.  If they were in the 45 ORER, they too made the list for 44.  That left a surprisingly few number of discrepancies.  I made some arbitrary decisions; B&O Chicago Terminal retains 51, next to its parent B&O 50 rather than the 1950 code of 64.  109 is Clinchfield, rather than the older Carolina, Clinchfield and Gulf.  Reading is 623, from the 1920 Philadelphia  and Reading.  I might be wrong about those interpretations, so I welcome feedback.  There are a few other oddities that I documented.

And for my modeling, I need four different Santa Fe headers for my waybills.  Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, 22, ATSF, for lines east of Albuquerque; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway, Coast Lines 30, ATCL, for lines west of Albuquerque; Panhandle & Santa Fe, 617, PSF, for the lines in Texas on the Slaton and Plains Divisions (around Amarillo); and Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe, 315, GCSF, for the rest of the Texas lines.  In practical terms, I’ll originate all my traffic on ATCL, 30 headed waybills, as well as any perishable traffic from southern California.  Helium cars will arrive on PSF, 617 headed waybills, cars from Houston or Dallas will be on GCSF, 315 headers.  And the LCL cars out of Corwith for San Francisco will be on ATSF, 22 waybills. 

Enjoy making more accurate paperwork.  You can find the sheet in excel 2003 format here:  https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6Ussn0SB6pfSE5UZzVxa1VsMEU/edit?usp=sharing



Wednesday, January 22, 2014

1973 Santa Fe Instructions for Barge Loading

I recently received the loan of a 1973 Valley Division Bulletin Book from John Berry.  What follows is an extract of the bulletins applicable to the geographic area at Richmond found on pages 85-87.

3.  PULLING AND LOADING BARGES: Following instructions will govern:

Engine Foremen are responsible for proper lining up of tracks on apron and barge.

The automatic air must be coupled up and working on al1 switch movements on and off barges, the only exception permissible will be when car with defective air brake will be set out.

Pulling or loading barges at Santa Fe landings - Engine Foremen must double on and double off with all loaded cars, except solid barge loads of merchandise cars.

Engine Foremen will stand on bow of barge at coupling of apron when pulling and loading to observe clearances, and must see that all members of his crew are in proper position at all times to pass signals.

Speed must not be greater than two miles per hour with car movements on aprons and barges.

Foremen will be particular in sizing up the cars to be loaded on barge in connection with excess width cars, cars with leaning roofs, doors bulging, and when necessary, make switch so leaning roof or bulging side will be on outside of the barge.

When necessary to shove rear cars on track hard up to stern block, Foreman will notify bargeman, who in turn will mark boat list accordingly for information of Forman of location pulling barge.

The switchmen at all Santa Fe landings and bargemen .at other landings will set sufficient hand brakes on each track, hand brake must not be released on track to be pulled on barge until coupling has been made.

Captains are responsible for proper and safe trimming of barges; Engine Foremen will make any changes found necessary at Captain’s request.

Triple loads of piling, timbers, pipe, structural steel or other commodities in open top cars loaded on barges must be loaded on center track.

When pulling cars from barges at Ferry Point and China Basin, Engine Foreman will observe barge and apron when the first pull is being made from the, port side to see that excessive list does not develop and damage the apron. If necessary, leave several . cars on the port side, and after pulling cars from starboard (right): side double back and finish pulling cars from port side (left). Captains of tugs can help in this by notifying Boat Dispatcher whenever heavy loads are to be unloaded.

Maximum Single Loads on Bay Area Ferry aprons -China Basin and Ferry Point No. 1 aprons designed for Cooper’s E-60, which is equivalent to total load of 600,000 pounds distributed over the 100 ft. length of apron. These aprons now restricted to maximum single load of 526,000 pounds. Before approving any overload on the aprons should let Mechanical Department say what would be maximum load could move from apron to barge with safety. Ferry Point apron No. 2 restricted to maximum single load of 350,000 pounds.

There is fence with gate at Ferry Point located across tracks leading to apron No. 1.  It will be the responsibility of the Engine Foreman to see that these gates are kept closed and locked with switch lock at all times when barges are not being worked, and it will also be his responsibility to see that gates when they are open arc locked: in gatekeepers so that gates will not swing into moving cars. Boat flats, when not being used, are to be left in the clear of fire road at all times.

Engines - San Francisco -Ferry Point, Slips Nos. 1& 2: At China Basin and: Ferry Point Slips Nos. 1 and 2, orange clearance line has been painted 10 feet from nose end apron opposite sign attached to gallows frame reading:

"ENGINES MUST NOT OPERATE BEYOND THIS LINE”

In other words, live engine may be operated on apron and in most cases only one idler will be required to load and unload barge.

Mechanical reefers -with motors running will be placed on outside track of barge away from wheel house.

In loading passenger cars and passenger express box cars on barges, Engine Foreman must see that rear ca r on starboard, port and center tracks does not contact stern block on track. This to avoid damage to steam hose equipment.

Foreign and: system gondolas arriving Terminal Division with hand brake wheel and ratchet installed on outside wall on end of car must be loaded on starboard or port side barge with brake wheel on outside, as will not clear cars on center track.

When loading barges and have any 50-feet or longer cars first out on either port or starboard side, see that they are left either on straight track or just in the clear on the bowl so that joints can be made when tying on to unload barges.

Cars with plug doors and mechanical reefers must not be loaded: on barges with doors open.

Whenever switch crews are pulling a barge at a Santa Fe landing when we have an extreme low tide, after pulling the port and starboard side, will set out all cars and come back against the middle rail with boat flats only.

4.         LOW CLEARANCE CARS: all mechanical-l reefers have diesel tanks underneath car which have extremely low clearance and Santa Fe hopper cars, Series 300,000, have dumps which have extremely low clearance under car.

When loading these cars during high or low tide, be careful to see they do not drag between apron and barge.

Account curvature of outside rail on barge, all equipment having length of 70 feet or more should be loaded on center rail of barge.

5.         LOADING SHPX TANK CARS ON BARGE: SHPX tank cars in Series 12,000 are all 60-foot cars. When loading on barges handle on middle rail only.

6.         CARS PROPERLY TURNED FOR UNLOADING:  We receive numerous cars in San Francisco which reach Terminal Division placarded to unload from one side. Frequently a car so placarded reaches final destination with 'wrong, door toward: platform, necessitating that car be switched out and returned to Richmond: for turning.  All concerned will please give special attention to this feature and see that cars are properly turned: before loading on barges to avoid: the necessity for returning the cars to Richmond for turning eliminating unnecessary' delay attached to the loading.


Bills, Bills, Bills What’s with all these Bills?

Bills, Bills, Bills
What’s with all these Bills?

Waybills, Freight Bills, Bills of Lading, all three are part of the documentation used to move goods by rail.  We all know about Waybills, sorta.  They are the documents that travel with the car (usually) and help it get where it needs to go.  The other two are often confused with the first, including by some professional archivists at the National Archives.  Look for waybills on eBay and you will find examples of all three on almost any given day.  So what are they really, and what do they mean to the model railroader?

First, lets explain what really goes on when a crate or carload of widgets needs to get from the manufacturer to the distributer.  There has to be a legal contract between the owner of the goods and the carrier so that they get where they’re going and that the shipper has some recourse if they don’t.  Then the goods need to have something with them that tells the carrier(s) where to take them and how to care for them during shipment.  Finally, somebody has to pay for these transportation services and they need some kind of invoice to keep their bean counters happy that they aren’t squandering their shareholder’s money.  Then there are the arrangements between carriers for use of equipment to transport these goods, that too needs documentation.

So how are our bills related to these essential functions?  First comes the Bill of Lading.  It is the contract between shipper and carrier.  It is almost always on the carrier’s form, but can be on one provided by the shipper.  I won’t say that some other carriers forms where NEVER used, but if they were, they would have to have been modified to show the originating carrier.  After all, this form is a contract between two specific parties, and those parties have to be clearly identified in  the contract for it to be valid.  So I won’t say that Standard Oil in Richmond never ran out of SP forms and used and ATSF one for an SP shipment, but IF (and that’s a humongous if) it happened, it would be extremely rare.  On the Santa Fe, Bills of Lading were the responsibility of the Freight Department.

Second is the waybill.  Cars don’t (or shouldn’t) move without documentation that tells what to do with the car.  How else are you going to know where to move it?  Switchlists, cut lists, movement orders and notes fall into this category, but are beyond the scope of this discussion.  They may be in addition to or in advance of a waybill, but the waybill is the basic document that gets a car from shipper to consignee.  The railroads used these forms for two purposes.  Tracking services provided shippers so they could get paid, and tracking loaded car usage so the car owners got paid.  Since these forms were the basis of revenue that had to be divided between those carriers that participated in providing the service, they were Accounting Department forms on the Santa Fe and most other roads.

Third is the Freight Bill.  When the dust is settled and the goods arrive, it’s time to pay the piper.  This is how it got done.  All the pick up and delivery charges, heater or icing charges, freight charges, switching charges, and other miscellaneous add ons that put black ink on the railroad accountant’s books got documented and paid with these forms.  Of all the various “bills” associated with railroading, the Freight Bill is the one that comes closest to the layman’s perception of a bill as an invoice that has to be settled with real money out of your pocket. 

So now you know what each of the three kinds of bills are for, why they are different, and now you need to go find only the waybills for your cherished prototype to have more realistic documents to operate you pike. 

WRONG!

You now have a better idea of what’s what, but they all can teach you something about how a given commodity was handled back in the day.  Getting a complete record of what happened fifty or a hundred years ago on a given railroad is tough, these were business records of mostly long gone businesses.  Most of the documents are either ash or buried in landfills so we need to examine any of the survivors for insights into ops of the day.

Lets start with the end product, the Freight Bill.  A true accounting form, train crews usually didn’t handle these unless they were attached to a waybill as part of a multi-part form.  Probably the least valuable to the model operator of the three, but it still has nuggets of valuable information.  At the least, you can see the shipper and consignee, what was shipped, how much of it, and what it cost.  You may not care about costs in your model empire, but knowing that EB Watts received widgets from AC/DC gives you a documented shipper pair.  If extra services were provided and billed, you might know that the widgets needed heater service, an extra operation to model if your layout is in the middle of a shipment, something to do with through freight cars besides icing.  It will also document those icing charges.  So don’t toss a Freight Bill in the dumpster because it’s not your holy grail waybill.

Next come Bills of Lading (BOL).  Why do we care about at contract?  That’s what they are after all.  Yes, contracts between shippers and carriers that list the car(s) employed, goods shipped, the route taken, and consignee to which delivered.  Sounds a lot like a waybill.  And the good archivists at NARA SF call them waybills in their finding aids.  They fooled me and I collected images of all the ones I could find in the records of the Office of Defense Transportation.  Imagine my disappointment when these “waybills” turned out not to be.  Well not as bad as I thought as they do contain an awful lot of valuable information for the model operator.  

Real bills of lading were normally three part forms with copy one the original bill of lading with all the standard legalese fine print on the back, copy two, a shippers order to the railroad, and three, a memorandum copy that the shipper could use as needed to facilitate his business.  Sometimes additional forms would be placed in common with the original and the preprinted copy numbers would be corrected as memoranda.  As legal contracts, there could only be a single original.  The shipper had to sign the original as his request for transportation and the originating carrier had to sign as their acceptance.  This established the legal transportation contract.  Copy two, the shippers order, went to the originating carrier, and they used it to prepare the way bill that would accompany or catch up with the car as it traveled the rail network with its goods to its destination.  Copy three could be used to advise interested parties of the shipment, as is found at NARA SF and my BOL copies of tank car movements.  BOL are valuable because they have most of the information seen on a waybill.  It won’t have a weight ticket, but often has a corrected weight.  It will have the reporting marks and car number(s) and the route.  It won’t have the record of movement recorded by the arrival stamps.  A pretty cool set of information and very valuable for the model operator.  A note about routing.  Shippers could specify routing if they so chose.  Otherwise the originating carrier would specify which of any alternative routes would be used.  Relations with shippers was one of the reasons Santa Fe had a Freight office in New York and NYC had one in San Francisco.  Shippers could say if they wanted SP or ATSF delivery if the destination was served by both and the railroads made aggressive efforts at capturing business nation wide.  These routings are useful on your model waybills.  The BOL can also contain special instructions for additional services.  All in all, a great resource for the modeler.  And sometimes train crews did handle BOL.  The 1973 ATSF Valley Division bulletin book has a bulletin on how conductors are to handle them.  In a nutshell, at a non-agency station, the shipper could prepare and sign the three part BOL and place it in a locked bill box near where the railroad would pick up the loaded car.  When the conductor picked up the car, he would sign the BOL, take copy 2 to the specified agency for waybilling, fill out a conductor’s waybill to document car movement, and return copies 1 & 3 of the signed BOL to the bill box for the shipper.  Something to think about adding to an ops session enhance play value, or not.

WAYBILLS, the Holy Grail of Car Documentation.  The waybill has it all.  Many folks such as Tony Thompson, Charles Hostetler, Andy Laurent and others have written extensively on waybills and how to model them more realistically.  I refer you to their blogs and websites for more detailed information.  What I’ll cover here is a basic description of what the waybill does and how it is used.  It documents the billable charges and records who performed which services during a loads transit form origin to destination.  It provides the legal basis for the division of revenue from a given shipment between the participating carriers and tells those carriers what services to perform and where and to whom to effect delivery.  A lot of responsibility for a 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper.  Since the waybill is the basis for the accounting task of interline revenue division, it is preprinted with the originating carrier’s interline accounting number.  This is the number you see next to the railroad name in the header and the footer.  It facilitates the book keeping by shortening Kewaunee, Green Bay and Western to 407 in the accounts.  Originating station agents would keep a copy of the Waybill to both make sure their railroad got paid, and to have a back up in case the original got separated from the shipment enroute.  Railroads had set procedures for astray freight and waybills, no 0-5-0ing allowed.  And there is a good variety of specialized waybills, ARA recommended pink stock for perishables.  Many roads used cards to return empty private meat reefers, ATSF used green.



ATSF also used blue cards for cotton.  That traffic might be moved in bulk to a compress, then baled for export.  Conductor’s waybills were an interim document to get a car moving until the clerks could type up the formal copy.  Coal bills, sulphur bills, ore bills, are all examples of specialized waybills that various roads used to minimize clerical overhead.  ATSF used green print on white cardstock to print their consigned empty car bills, used for cars in dedicated service such as auto parts pools from the late 50’s.  The variety of specialized waybills is vast, if not endless.  Santa Fe had four versions of their basic waybill, one for each of their operating companies, ATSF, ATSF Coast Lines, P&SF, and GC&SF.  Similarly there were four Santa Fe versions of the perishable, livestock, transit, and expedited movement waybills as well.  I’m still looking for images of these ATSF forms.  If you have one to share, please contact me at NorthBayLines at att dot net.  I have not yet found my holy grail.

Modeler’s Dilemma, too many waybill forms?  You should see a variety of waybill forms on your inbound loads.  Since the originating carriers all put the shipping information on THEIR waybill form, the shipment of jeep parts for the Richmond plant should be on a GTW form regardless of the reporting marks of the car in which it is loaded.  Same thing for the farm implements that originate on the Wabash or the component chemicals from Texaco on the CRI&P.  Modelling waybills can give you an additional taste of history in your ops sessions.
Despite all this variety, the outgoing loads are much simpler.  Most of us model only a single road with industries that originate loads.  Therefore we only need that road’s waybills for originating traffic.  So all of your loads out will be on the home road forms, as well as the loads in that originated on the home road.  Suddenly your waybill modeling task is cut in half or less. 

Have fun!

JOHN BARRY

Cameron Park, CA

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Evolution of Valley Division Infrastructure Part One Trackwork and Communications

Evolution of Valley Division Infrastructure
Part One Trackwork and Communications

I spent a few pleasant hours yesterday at the California State Railroad Museum Library.  They are moving the bulk of their offsite collection to a new facility and it is not available.  That’s a bummer for me as several of those items contain what should be a treasure trove for carfloats and carfloat ops.  On the other hand, much that is in the closed stacks at the reading room is available and I found a few goodies yesterday, among them the Employee Time Table (ETT) collection.  For those of you who have purchased the reprints published by the ATSFRRH&MS, this collection fills in the gaps between the society books.  It is way too much information for looking at the whole system, you could be there for many months reading through timetables.  But it is a great resource to zero in on a specific point in time, or to understand the evolution of a particular location. 

Today I’ll share my initial observations of how the trackwork evolved over the decade surrounding my modeling year of 1944.  I looked at ETTs from the teens through the early 50’s yesterday.  Even limited to the Valley and SF terminal divisions, there were way too many to copy the entire time table and still have any money left in my 401K.  So I limited myself to the area (Third and Oakland Districts) and time (1940-1950) that I model.  I should have gone a little further though, and gotten a copy of the timetable pages that coincided with the 52 track chart that I have.  Next trip!  Fortunately for my pocketbook, the needed information easily fit on two 11x17 pages from both the pre-44 horseblanket size or post-44 wide size ETTs.  This got me out the door with 36 pages from Valley Div #80 of 14 January 1940 to #97 of 24 September 1950, in exchange for $18 of copy fees.  Thank you Cara and the rest of the CSRM staff!

Why did I pull so many ETTs?  First, the society ETT 1942 reprint is slightly earlier than my modeling era of 1944 and I know that there were several changes to the track chart that I have from 1952.  I just wish that I had remembered to gather all of the editions to that 52 date.  Second, although it ended just before my era, I am quite fond of the semi-streamlined Valley Flier, and am fortunate to have acquired the set the late Ralph Marcus painted and lettered and I wanted info on its schedule.  So, collecting I awent.

A general observation, it didn’t change much, even to the present day.  The alignment is pretty much as built, most of the steel ballasted deck girder bridges are still in use today, along with the Muir trestle and bascule bridges.  They may no longer lift, but the structure is still there for contemporary photography.  So what changes did occur in my era?  The trains and their times, but that is part two.  Water, Communications, Sidings, and a few changes or deletions of Stations from the ETT and that is what follows.

Water:  During the forties, the Santa Fe decommissioned the water facilities at Christie & Glen Frazer and installed new ones at Port Chicago.  Christie has water in #80 and #81 of 1940, but not #81 of 1942.  The change from Glen Frazer to Port Chicago is noted in #94 of 28 November 1947.  That makes it easy for me to model the wooden water tank and trackside water cranes without worrying about anachronisms as I do with the Richmond turntable (lengthened in 44) or the Pinole Depot (burned and rebuilt).  So for my layout, I will have water at Richmond, Glen Frazier, and Antioch.  I will probably also use modelers license to move the Orwood spout to Middle River as I don’t think I want to build two bascule bridges. 

Communications.  The train order office at Muir closed during the decade of interest.  It shows as an office of communication through #87 of 1943, but as a phone booth in #88 of 1945 and removed from the ETT in #96 of April 1950.  With it’s short siding and nearby Glen Frazer, Muir Depot is a candidate for selectively compressing out of my track plan.

Stations:  Many changes of name occurred since initial construction, only one in the 40’s though.  Dwight, at MP 4.5 of the Oakland District, became El Cerrito at the same location with ETT #82 of 1 January 1942.  Dupont and the other changes came later.  #96 of 2 April 1950 eliminated four stations on the Third District. Woodsbro, Muir, Herpoco, and San Pablo did not appear as named stations although their sidings may have remained.  I will have to look at the tracks between stations pages of the ETTs to tell, and I did not capture that data on this trip. 

Sidings:  Changes to where and how long the sidings were was the biggest change observed in the decade of the 40’s.  Even so, the changes were modest and not wide spread.  I think that several of the changes reflect a change in the way the Santa Fe determined siding length rather than a change in the physical plant.  There are three timetables in the period where nearly all of the sidings on the Divisions change length by several cars, but retain the same general proportions as the entries in the preceding version.  These changes occurred with #87 of 1943 where an average of seven cars was removed from the siding capacities of longer sidings.  #90 of July 1946 lengthened nearly all sidings to almost the capacities listed in #86, while #94 of November 1948 shortened them back to the levels of #87.  There is evidence of some physical changes though.  Timetable #82 of January 1942 saw the three sidings of over 120 car length on the third district changed to shorter north and south sidings of the same total length at their respective stations.  Gately of 128 cars became 63N/65S, Christie of 131 cars became 57N/74S, and Glen Frazer of 124 cars became 51N/73S.  I cann’t prove it, but I suspect this was accomplished by installing a cross over near the mid point and swapping designation of main and siding on half the track.  That would have gained a lot of operational flexibility with a minimum of effort for the section forces and would have aided keeping the trains moving as the Pacific war build up was just beginning.  Later, #88 of January 1945 showed sidings were lengthened at Trull 57 to 94 cars long, Knightsen 41 to 90, Sando 67 to 109, Pittsburg 70 to 90, Christie north siding 50 to 94, Luzon 57 to 101 and Rheem 57 to 90.  Changes introduced with #90 include lengthening Gillis from 36 to 100 cars, eliminating the south siding at Christie, and the north siding at Gately while Gately’s south went from 58 to 106 cars. 


The late date of the longer sidings points me toward modeling the track configuration as it was in 1944.  But I am reserving judgment until I’ve analyzed the changes in the scheduled trains, as the siding length affected where they scheduled meets.

Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Sources


            Sources, Correcting Errors, and the Journey of NEOX 238

I’ve not posted in a long time, but I have been doing more research for the back story of the North Bay Lines.  In an attempt to build a more accurate freight car fleet, I’ve been combing through the copies of the materials I gathered at the National Archives San Bruno Branch last fall.  I also recently transcribed the 1936 ATSF Statement of Steam Locomotive Assignments to a searchable spreadsheet.  In both cases, I was fortunate to have digital copies of the originals from the respective archives.  Usually archival materials are considered primary sources: contemporaneous (made at the time), by those who took part in whatever is recorded.  But some times you have secondary sources (derived from primary sources) mixed in with the primary ones.  And then, you have what we as members of the general public and rail fans most often encounter, tertiary sources, compilations of historic facts compiled by others separated by time and experience from the original event.  My spread sheets are tertiary sources.  They are useful to us and they allow us to “know” a lot more about some particularly arcane bit of history such as the journey of NEOX 238, but they may contain errors, certainly contain judgments, and if used enough, get accepted as “gospel” by the community.  Two well documented examples of errors propagating and repeating in derived works are the “drawbars” between Santa Fe’s FTA and FTB units and the “blind center drivers” on the Santa Fe’s 3800 class 2-10-2s.  Neither of these widely accepted “facts” is true, yet they are continually raised in support of someone’s argument in rail fan discussions.  And worse, they have a tendency to crop up as inaccuracies in otherwise exquisite models.

We as amateur historians have a responsibility to future generations of scholars and rail fans to get things as right as we can, acknowledge errors and correct them, and preserve as best we can information for those who will discover the joys and grit of this hobby of ours when we are the unknowns to them that we are grateful to today for the images of days long past.

So lets take a look at the journey of NEOX 238 and see what it can tell us about how we can better document history and have some fun with our railroading.  Digging through the files of the Office of Defense Transportation located in the National Archives branch at San Bruno I found a file with a “Tank Car Report” of the interchange between the Santa Fe and the SP at Port Chicago, California covering the last 10 days of November 1944.  PAYDIRT!  Here is a document that covers one of the stations I model, during the time I operate that I had almost no information on before.  Wow, what a lucky find.  And most of the information is great a table of the cars interchanged with Car Number, Contents, Origin, Destination, Billing Date, Interchange Arrival Date, Destination Arrival Date, Placement and Release Dates, Date Returned to Interchange, and Final Destination.  With this one document I was able to get an idea about the volume of tank car interchange at what I had previously considered to be only a point to exchange munitions as the Naval Magazine was located there, infamous for the explosion that destroyed a couple of ships and the SP depot and killing many of the black seamen who were employed as stevedores.  Here was a good reason to run something besides strings of box cars.  Dated 12 December 1944, written by ICC service agent Orion A. Westlake, the document is certainly contemporaneous and offers much seemingly original information with its list of cars, contents and dates.  And some of it, such as his documentation of the SP backlog at Bayshore is of a primary source nature.  But I think this is an example of a secondary source in the archives.  I don’t think Orion sat at the interchange and took his own notes for 10 days and then wrote them up two weeks later.  He was most likely tasked to find out why tank cars were being delayed at this particular location and he documented what he found.  We don’t know his sources, but it was likely the actual waybills and or junction and station records.  According to his report, NEOX 238 billed on 9 November at Atreco Texas with a load of Cumene for Avon, California.  From the earlier narrative in the document we learn that the consignee was the Tidewater Associated Oil Company.  We can infer from other sources about the origin that the Shipper was the Atlantic Refining Company and that the originating RR was the KCS.  Likewise, we can infer that the empty consignee was the Phillips Petroleum Company, also served by KCS.  Since arrival and departure at Port Chicago were on the ATSF, a likely interchange with KCS common to both routes was Beaumont, Texas.  During the war, (and this is why we even have this document) tank cars were in tight supply and managed as a critical national asset by the government.  With whatever delays in moving to Beaumont, she joined a group of other tanks billed the same route, made a fast journey across Texas in hot freights through Silsbee, Somerville, Temple, Brownwood, Sweetwater, and Lubbock, before arriving on the transcon at Clovis.  From there she ran west to Belen where she ran along with the myriad of MAIN trains running as extra sections of the Chief, Scout, Grand Canyon and Fast Mail through Barstow.  She made good time over Tehachapi, and was expedited up the Valley to Stockton.  There she probably switched into a local for delivery at Port Chicago or she continued as part of a Port Chicago block in the SCX bound for Richmond.  On arrival at Port Chicago on the 20th, she was handled expeditiously by both the SP and Tidewater, moving to Avon the same day, placed at the Refinery and released for return the next day on the 21st arriving back at Port Chicago on the 22nd where she continued back to the Gulf coast and further loads in support of the war effort.  But what did she look like?  How large a car? Capacity?  To find those answers, we turn to a contemporaneous secondary source, the ORER dated October 1945.  There we find entries for nearly all of the car numbers listed in the report, but not NEOX 238.  What gives?  Not only is there not an entry for that car, NEOX was not an assigned reporting mark in Oct 45.  OK, let’s check our April 43 edition.  Same result—NEOX isn’t assigned to any private car owner.  What to do?  The document clearly shows N as the leading character in the reporting mark.  But that mark is bogus, not assigned at that time.  Do we delete the whole entry?  That doesn’t make sense because it will skew the quantities of cars handled and the types of loads and destinations.  So that’s not a good answer.  Do we leave it as is and say nothing?  I don’t think so, because somebody in the future will cite my work as reason the ORER of that era was “wrong” and should have included NEOX, their favorite imagined “North East Oil Company”, a total fabrication.  I don’t want another FT “drawbar” controversy, so bad idea.  Foot note it that it’s bogus?  Might be OK, but most folks won’t look and it may still have the bad results that leaving totally alone can have.  Is there another way?  Maybe.  We can not conclusively determine the truth without finding source of Orion’s information, but we can make an educated guess.  At this point, we are certain that some kind of error crept into this secondary source because it has a car number that did not exist.  Without either the original waybill or interchange record, it will require judgment on our part.  We know the car in question is a tank, as that is the subject of the report.  We know it is most likely privately owned, as at that time, nearly all the tanks in interchange were.  We also can assume that part if not most of the number is correct as the rest of the car numbers in the report check out.  So what went wrong, and how do we fix it?  The true original information was most likely hand written if it came from a station or junction record.  The waybill could have been also, but more likely typewritten.  Either way, something didn’t get transcribed correctly from the sighting of the car to the jumbo book, the jumbo to the original hand tally for the report, or the typist who mostly succeeded in deciphering Orion’s penciled notations to make it pretty for Washington.  Where ever it occurred, the error made it onto a piece of paper on 12 December 1944 and has sat there since, waiting for propagation or correction.  No other similar reporting marks begin with N.  That was my first guess, and not a good one.  And all the private owners ended in X in those days, so that wasn’t much help.  Then I scanned through the assigned reporting marks tables in the ORER.  Looking for the proverbial needle in the haystack with predictable results, none.  But it could have paid off if I’d gotten lucky, as the next search illustrates.  Then I decided to look for similar reporting marks in the report itself.  But I used my previous efforts of transcription to excel, not the original images converted to PDF.  Using the auto filter function on the Mark column, I looked at my possible selections, UTLX, GATX, COSX, etc.  Then at the bottom of the column in the dropdown box, I saw it: WEOX.  White Eagle Division of Socony-Vacuum.  Car WEOX 1059 billed on the 4th and arrived on the 25th also from Atreco, Texas.  Could NEOX really be WEOX?  I think so!  N looks like a W without the left most down stroke.  Could it be that a scribbled W was perceived as an N?  WEOX 238 is in a series documented in the ORER, a two compartment 8,000 gallon, 100,000 pound tank.  It fits, it’s plausible, and other variations of the reporting mark and number don’t.  So I will use WEOX 238 in the spreadsheet.  I will also put in a note about what I did to change the original data for the benefit of anyone who cares why my tertiary source differs from what I found in the report.  As a bonus, I think that I’ll model that two compartment car.  It will add visual interest to both my freight trains and the operations of the interchange:  A small difference in that string of black tank cars.   So alas, NEOX 238 didn’t take a journey in the fall of 44 after all, but we can reasonably infer that WEOX 238 did!

Here's a photo of MOBX 228 graciously supplied by Richard Hendrickson.  The WEOX cars were later re-marked as MOBX and this is a very likely sister.  



An aside, looking for the above, I just found a car that I’ll have to build: True’s Oil Company TOCX 10, a 6,429 Gallon 60K capacity car out of Spokane, Washington.  True is our 5 year old Andalusian Filly who has been on a diet including Rice Bran Oil.  

Who say’s that research is dry and boring?  I can represent it with a small silver tank on arch bar trucks.  I can route it from a processor in Stockton to Cotati via Richmond and Tiburon and use the car float as well.  And my horse will have the oil she needs depicted on the layout.  

This closes with one more coincidence or serendipitous occurrence in life; a fitting inside joke that melds two of my hobbies: living and iron horses.